Negotiating Good Contracts for Startup Companies

January 06, 2009


I was writing about my own startup companies, then found Ryan Carson’s post on building his web applications.


Here is the part of the post I found particularly interesting, the contract:



Elliott [the developer] will receive 10% of monthly revenues, after the expenses listed above. If he launches the site on time (3pm April 20th), this will increase to 15% (hat tip to Natasha on that idea). When the site hits $25,000 monthly revenue (excluding VAT), his take will increase to 25%.

His monthly cheque will be determined by a snapshot of the revenue on the 1st of every month at 9am.

If the app is sold, Elliott will receive 10% of the cash price, after lawyer and accountancy costs.

I build web applications so I can relate to Elliott here as well as many of you (my readers). The only difference between me and Elliottis that I own the company who knows all the people to hire and how to get it done. My company is called,“MJG International”and establishes these type of business partnerships.

Carsonified Wins, Elliott Loses (mostly)

Before I rip apart the Carsonified contract, I want to say quick – Ryan Carson, if you are reading this thank you for sharing the information, it serves as a good example to work from. And certainly I am not accusing you of being dishonest – I just don’t agree with the contract.

Now here is my opinion on the Carsonified-Elliot contract. I’m not sure why Elliott would build the product for no money and 10-25% of the application under certain performance terms. I think this is a really bad contract completely in the favor of Carsonified. Here is why it sucks for Elliott:

Wow, talk about getting kicked in the butt by a contract. Carsonified gets all the cheese for having the idea and negotiating the contract. Good work negotiating, Carsonified!

How To Negotiate a Good Contract

Now I’d like to share with you how I negotiate a contract. When I say,"you"here that means you as the developer. Assuming you want to go on these ventures.


That is all off the top of my head. Because I’ve been through this I feel it is my duty to protect the on-the-ground workers who can actually finish products. Once I get good at executing and have a lot of successes under my belt, I’ll probably take more like 70% of the product instead of 30%, since the only thing the company partnering with you is doing is have the initial idea, which is important – but everybody has ideas! Execution of the idea means a lot, especially in web development.

Let me assure you that I value the business partnerships I make and their ideas. The contracts I’ve made so far have been fair and everyone has been great to work with! I hope you all reading this can have the same.

Be fair, don’t be square. You rock, peace all.

7 comments

#1. Matt Curry on January 06, 2009

Hey Marc,
I remember reading that post when it was first published and having the same reaction as you. My favorite part: “One day of Ryan’s time per week for management (normally charged out at £800 per day, but reduced to £300).” Granted that’s coming out of the overall revenue, but it seems insane that Ryan would charge for his time, when he’s already taking most of the $$$.

-Matt

#2. Dave Dash on January 06, 2009

Nice, I am always shocked when I see contracts and offers my way by idea people and my cut is low. Although usually these are with pay, so it doesn’t matter too much.

#3. Jeff on January 07, 2009

I wouldn’t believe anything you read about Carsonified. The company is like the Derren Brown of businesses. Ryan has got to be the most big-headed gimp on the web today and that’s some achievement. £800 per day from a company situated in Bath! My private dentist charges less than that.

Either Ryan is lying and that’s just his dream target (i.e. an annual consultancy salary of over £200k) or Carsonified’s customers have more money than sense. It doesn’t take a genius to work out that answer – given that Carsonified have just made their lead developer redundant and are “struggling” to get through the recession.

I find it quite Ryans cheek quite amusing

#4. Brian D. on January 07, 2009

This sort of approach is rampant in the United States, too. I make it a policy not to work for sweat equity because it’s so abused (I live in NYC). This is a good overview of how to handle sweat equity requests if you’re open to that sort of project.

#5. Marc Grabanski on January 07, 2009

Thanks for your comments, all.

Matt: I never read that part about Ryan charging for managment. That is like taking the cheese before the cheese gets divided up among the members.

Dave: there are a lot of idea people that just aren’t business-savvy enough to realize that paying your developers well can turn into a better product, making more profit in the long run for all involved!

Jeff: those are some harsh words about Ryan and Carsonified – I don’t know them so I can’t comment on that. Though, £200k for a company isn’t that amazing. The agency I worked for had 32+ locations and the location I worked for made over £8+ million in consulting ($12+ million USD).

Brian D: Sweat equity is not abuse in and of itself. Sweat equity where the person sweating doesn’t get much equity is abuse!
There are plenty of successful companies started with sweat equity that turned into a good profit for all parties involved. You just have to learn to cut the deal right and take calculated risks.

#6. Jeff on January 08, 2009

@Marc

You read my post incorrectly, Ryan alone has revealed he strives for an annual salary of £200k+ (£800 per day) for consultancy – only his time, not the company. I wasn’t claiming that the entire “Carsonified Ltd” turnover was £200k – of course not, that is quite low for a company of around 8-12 employees.

I don’t know Carsonified either, but my comments are based on their recent actions that they stupidly chose to make public knowledge.

#7. Marc Grabanski on January 08, 2009

Thanks for clearing that up, Jeff – sorry that I misunderstood your first comment.

Leave a comment

Comment in textile images by gravatar